□️ Children's safety and welfare has a long history of being used to push more draconian policies regarding justice, surveillance, and regulating speech. I think they're uncommon in the UK but the Tories seem to like them. In the US, SWAT raids and false convictions are routine. □️ Reporting false positives to law enforcement will result in a lot of innocent civilians having their homes destroyed and property seized, and prisons filled with warm bodies, especially minorities and other undesirables. Such a system would be terribly affected by the moderation paradox. □️ Techdirt has showcased several arguments that no, CSAM can't be detected in unencrypted stacks of picure data without tons of false positives and negatives, let alone encrypted pics. One of the charities supporting the government-funded initiative, The Marie Collins Foundation, retweeted this: media companies DO have the option to protect their users through E2EE whilst also detecting and removing child sexual abuse material, and it can all be done by adding our tech to these platforms- as it can detect CSAM even in E2EE platforms #NoPlaceToHide We are in favour of both strong privacy and children’s safety and urge social media companies to protect both. We are not opposed to end-to-end encryption, as long as it is implemented in a way that does not put children at risk. avoid detection by law enforcement agencies.make, share or view sexual images of children.They need to show that the changes will not make it easier for child sex abusers to: We want social media companies to confirm they will not implement end-to-end encryption until they have the technology in place to ensure children will not be put at greater risk as a result. To ban e2e encryption on anything that could potentially enable children to contact or be contacted on it, unless there is software to 'monitor' what's being shared or 'prevent' certain images being shared, or check everyone's age and identities, or whatever.įrom the government's noplacetohide website: It's important to realise that the government is asking for more than they will get, so they can get a lesser prize even if they don't get the grand prize. Companies will concentrate their media efforts on saving money.Īnd then somehow its done, it operates at expense of your taxes.Īnd whats worse, appetite for control comes with eating. Masses followed "huh, so government has this idea, tech people claim to be bascially impossible to implement". When Russian government implemented a law forcing all(sn) companies to keep all logs for 3 years and install special server gateways for traffic control, privacy-caring and well-educated tech society quickly discarded "this kills off privacy" argument. Government will make this their only problem and will make sure none focuses on privacy, but on how much billions you'd have to spend to realize this "impossible idea". They'll get agreement with government, get investements, government contracts or tax refunds, timeouts, operational help, whatever. Never concentrate on "how companies would operate"They will always manage. Learn from Russian or Australian community. Orgīuilding the global movement for the protection of privacy. Related Subreddits:Ĭonsider donating to one of the organizations that fight for your rights. u/blackhawk_12 Subreddit Rules and Wikiīefore posting in /r/privacy, read the Sidebar Rules.Įnjoy our Wiki! It has all sorts of nifty advice and explains most topics you’re interested in if you’re reading this. "I don't have anything to hide but I don't have anything I want to show you either" Dedicated to the intersection of technology, privacy, and freedom in the digital world.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |